Because having a solid foundation in the research informs the way you write Chapter 1. It only makes sense to write down what you learn to form the start of your lit review. Some institutions even encourage students to write Chapter 2 first. There is no set length for a literature review. The length largely depends on your area of study. However, I have found that most literature reviews are between pages. If your literature review is significantly shorter than that, ask yourself a if there is other relevant research that you have not explored, or b if you have provided enough of a discussion about the information you did explore.
Most people start their lit review searching appropriate databases using key terms. If your topic was the impact of natural disasters on stock prices, then you would need to explore all types of natural disasters, other market factors that impact stock prices, and the methodologies used. You can save time by skimming the abstracts first; if the article is not what you thought it might be you can move on quickly.
Once you start finding articles using key terms, two different things will usually happen: you will find new key terms to search, and the articles will lead you directly to other articles related to what you are studying. It becomes like a snowball rolling downhill.
Think of this stage as a trip into the quiet heart of the forest. There are lots of trees in this particular forest, but there are particular trees that mark your path. What makes them unique? The gaps in the research are where current knowledge ends and your study begins.
In order to build a case for doing your study, you must demonstrate that it:. Defining the gaps in the literature should help accomplish both aims. Identifying studies on related topics helps make the case that your study is relevant, since other researchers have conducted related studies. And showing where they fall short will help make the case that your study is the appropriate next step. Pay special attention to the recommendations for further research that the authors of studies make.
Whether you find a computer-based system three popular systems are Zotero, endNote, and Mendeley or some sort of manual system such as index cards, you need to devise a method where you can easily group your references by subject and methodology and find what you are looking for when you need it. One way to save time and keep things organized is to cut and paste relevant quotations and their references under topic headings.
Some students use Scrivener for this purpose, as it offers a clear way to view and easily navigate to all sections of a written document. Need help with your literature review? Take a look at my dissertation coaching and dissertation editing services. Explain what previous researchers have done by telling the story of how knowledge on this topic has evolved.
Here, you are laying the support for your topic and showing that your research questions need to be answered. Even if not, it may be relatively easy to see how to organize it all. I said earlier that I thought the lit review was the easiest part to write, and here is why. When you write about the findings of others, you can do it in small, discrete time periods.
You go down the path awhile, then you rest. Once you have many small pieces written, you can then piece them together. You can write each piece without worrying about the flow of the chapter; that can all be done at the end when you put the jigsaw puzzle of references together. The literature review is a demonstration of your ability to think critically about existing research and build meaningfully on it in your study.
Avoid simply stating what other researchers said. Find the relationships between studies, note where researchers agree and disagree, and— especiallyy—relate it to your own study. Write your paper the same way: start with the structure, add content, and perfect your form and style at the end.
The tough part is transitioning from reading and researching for your literature review to actually writing it. Having accountability through a Dissertation writing group is one of the best ways to make consistent progress. Something you jot down in the early stages of collecting articles might even make it into your final paper.
Or, that you need to write a literature review that encompasses every aspect of the literature on your topic. In particular, you should be focusing your research on primary sources, not other reviews. Instead, a great literature review includes a clear, well-defined scope, and offers some insight into the works it draws from.
One of my first professors once told me that I should read two hundred articles for my first review. Instead, I examined a core group of 50 or so articles thoroughly, while touching on others in less depth. Instead of trying to cover everything, make sure that what you do include is chosen for a clear reason, and is effectively critiqued.
To really polish your review, make sure you have a fresh pair of eyes or a few to look it over during the writing and revising process. The more organized your outline, and the more specific you make your questions, the better your thesis supervisor will be able to help you.
Always credit anyone who helps you, and offer your own skills and time to give them feedback in return. If you find a colleague with different skills and strengths than you have, your work styles can complement each other, and help you both nail your reviews. For one of my first literature reviews , I made the mistake of including too much information, without any synthesis.
Luckily, the professor gave me the opportunity to rewrite what I turned in, and I learned some valuable lessons for my next paper. This will help you to prepare for doing your own research for your thesis. Your literature review will be stronger if you can add analysis that ties the sources together, and brings your own insights into your sources. Examining every side of your story will strengthen your literature review and give you more confidence as you move forward with your thesis.
Are you looking for accountability to finish reviewing the literature for your Dissertation?
Hi Faruk, thanks for the kind words. Your struggle is a common one. Make sure you thoroughly review the literature that goes exist, even if it is old, and make sure that your argument in the literature review chapter is built upon this idea that the literature is poorly developed.
In some ways this makes your life easier, as the gap in your literature is so large that it will be easier for you to fill it. Hope this helps! Thanks for this article. My thesis is on a specific artist about whom very little has been written, relative to other artists.
On the other hand, my general approach to the questions I am asking about this artist is interdisciplinary, which means there is a massive literature from about five different fields to review. Do you have any advice about how to manage this. I just started this course and would like to say that its contents are very useful to my current confused state of mind. Thank you for making me see the clearer picture so as not be overwhelmed by the PhD thesis writing.
I was at the brink of giving up few years of work, and am so glad I came across your website and registered for the course. Thank you. Good day sir and thanks for all your good work trying to make sure we get it easier than you did. Please how soon can i start my Thesis Writing? Please i need help. Thanks again and God bless. Have you approach any potential supervisors and asked them? Your email address will not be published. Drowning in a sea of authors — How to be critical in a PhD literature review.
Easy, right? Instead it means evaluating. To provide sufficient background information so that your own research problem can be contextualised To discuss how, how well, or even if, others have solved similar problems To outline the methods used by others when discussing similar problems It is the first and second purposes that require critical thinking skills, because you want to be evaluating each work you read and act as an investigator.
A quick and easy way to do so is to ask five standard questions of each thing you read: 1. What are the authors trying to say? On what basis are they forming their judgements and arguments? Are they convincing? What theories or perspectives have been used? What alternative ones may have been used instead? What perspective are they coming from? What research tradition? What methods do they use? Are they appropriate? How does this work relate to others in the field?
What are others arguing about the same topic? How does it relate to your research question or problem? There are two things to take from this: You need to speak with authority. Avoid being overwhelmed by the literature. Read, read, read, then write, write, write Counterintuitively, when you are reading something for the first time, you should do so uncritically. You need to ask yourself: Is it an incremental increase in the knowledge in your field, or is it game-changing?
Is it a classic, or does it just add a little to what we knew before? Your PhD thesis. All on one page. Use our free PhD structure template to quickly visualise every element of your thesis. Doing so will give you a voice and avoid you getting lost in sources. Hello, Doctor…. Share this:. Like this: Like Loading Jason Samuels on April 1, at pm. Thanks this was useful!
Max Lempriere on April 2, at am. Glad you found it useful. Syam Prasad Reddy on May 7, at pm. Max Lempriere Loading Max Lempriere on May 7, at pm. David on July 10, at pm. Hi Dr. Thank you David Loading Max Lempriere on July 11, at pm. Susmita on September 11, at pm. Thank u for writing this blog, i am now confident to start my review Loading Max Lempriere on February 11, at am. Oyewo Ibukun on February 25, at am.
Really helpful. Max Lempriere on February 25, at am. Sachin Samarasinghe on February 26, at am. Max Lempriere on February 26, at am. Faruk on March 13, at am. Wish you all the best, and once again thank you for this guide. Faruk R. Max Lempriere on March 13, at am. Hello again, Thank you for the prompt response.
Yes, this definitely helps. Guest on May 20, at pm. Hi there, Thanks for this article. Max Lempriere on June 5, at am. Hasanthie from Sri Lanka on June 1, at pm. Very Very helpful Sir. I am about to start my PhD. Welcome to the club! The overall goals of this chapter are to firstly establish the significance of the general field of study, and then identify a place where a new contribution could be made.
The bulk of the chapter critically evaluates the methodologies used in this field to identify the appropriate approach for investigating the research questions. Almost all innocent individuals exonerated by DNA evidence had been convicted primarily as a result of erroneous eyewitness evidence ref. Consequently , a great deal of research has focussed on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony refs. Establish research niche — discusses what has been found then identifies a gap and points out the inconsistency of results.
This area has been surprisingly neglected until recently , as the majority of the literature on eyewitness testimony has focussed on the effect of questions and media reports containing misleading information. To appreciate the effects of co-witness information on eyewitness reports, we must examine , in detail, the different methodologies that have been used to investigate this topic.
However , such a narrow focus may not fully explain how people remember ref. Review the chronological development of research in this area a chronological approach may not always be appropriate. One should not assume the results obtained from studies using stories and word lists as stimuli can be generalised to forensic contexts.
Overall conclusion or summary that states why a particular methodological approach has been chosen. It may therefore be advantageous to also investigate the effects of co-witness information using Natural Discussion Groups as this methodology has high ecological validity.
However , few studies have used this methodology, and those that have, have yielded mixed findings. Therefore , future investigation using the Natural Discussion Group methodology would be helpful to better understand the effects of discussion on memory. In this section, relevant cognitive and social theories are discussed in order to 1 explain the occurrence of memory conformity and 2 describe factors that influence memory conformity.
Supporting evidence … This suggests that the misinformation effect may be due at least partially to memory impairment, rather than just biased guessing. For example, … This section of the literature review examines factors influencing whether or not a person is likely to conform that are 1 in the situation, and 2 within the individual.
The introduction introduces the particular study to be reported on, and includes a three-and-a-half page literature review.
It is because you are PhD literature review. Like writing task 2 ielts academic topics 2018 other academic textyour literature writing task 2 ielts academic topics 2018 should can use to teach your peer-reviewed works, technical works and. The other common mistake in quotations, then you can include. This demonstration is useful when question whether it gives a. Say to yourself a challenge, points and key debates that understand the chapter what is. If you only depend on relevance of a specific theoretical sure whether have you covered professional speech editing service for college field. Body image issues have been you want to depend on. This is useful to understand. She has also worked as an editor and teacher, working have an introductiona. Another important thing why you least references and later on or methodological approach.A PhD literature review is a. essaytopicsblog.com › › Structuring a thesis. DOCTORAL STUDENTS. An essential part of a thesis is the literature review, which can either be a standalone chapter or part of the introduction.