A critical analysis is a type of text dealing with a particular article or book in detail while a literature review is a broader kind of document. It is important to read on article review samples as this helps learners of a particular field to get introduced to the work of experts in that specific field. The article reviews examples help in different ways such as:. Article review like any other written assignment can be completed with the help of experienced academic writers.
Check out our full review: read about best essay writing service review more. You should be aware that the audience of the review has knowledge on the subject matter and is not just a general audience. You need to summarize the main ideas of the article, arguments, positions, and findings. Also, critique the contributions of the material and overall effectiveness of the field.
Note that,. You need to know the setup of your article review to understand how to read the article. Following these steps will help you in writing a useful review:. Look at the title of the article, abstract, introduction, headings, opening sentences of paragraphs and conclusion.
Read it several times making notes on essential sections. Just highlight central points and the supporting facts. You should write notes and state cross-references on the essential points. After reviewing the summary outline, identify the significant aspects such as instances of effective writing, contributions to the field and areas which are to be improved in the article. Also, indicate strengths and weaknesses. For instance, an advantage may be the way the author presents an issue while a gap may be that the article does not offer solutions to a problem or lacks enough information on a particular subject.
Read also: How do you write an evaluation essay? After the preparation, you can finally write the review, and it includes the following steps:. A title can either be a descriptive one, a declarative or an interrogative one. It depends on the focus of your review.
Write the citation of the article in a proper style just after the title of your review. It starts with the identification sentence. The introduction of the article review also entails the central themes of the article. Step 5: W rite the summary of the article. Write the main points, arguments, and findings in your own words.
Also, show how the article supports its claims and write the conclusion. Also, write your opinion on how thorough and useful the explanation of the subject you found in the article is. Indicate the contributions and the importance of the article to the field. Be as specific as possible to get targeted help within the minute timeframe. Walden University Writing Center. Paper reviews: Sample paper reviews. Didn't find what you need? Search our website or email us.
Read our website accessibility and accommodation statement. Paper Reviews: Sample Paper Reviews. Print Page Report a broken link. Note that these sample paper reviews have not yet been updated for APA 7 changes. Undergraduate Papers. Sample Reviews of Undergraduate Papers This document contains excerpts of undergraduate papers with sample feedback from the Writing Center.
Please click on the file to view. Graduate Papers. Sample Reviews of Graduate Papers This document contains excerpts of graduate-student papers with sample feedback from the Writing Center. Discussion Posts. Sample Review of a Discussion Post This document contains an excerpt of a discussion post with sample feedback from the Writing Center.
Peter Bakke. A short summary of this paper. Based upon upper echelon and information processing theories, the researchers hypothesized that five CEO characteristics age, tenure, education, international experience, and duality - that is, CEO also as board chairman were significant moderating effects upon international firm performance.
Using regression analyses, the researchers concluded that four of the predictors, excluding CEO tenure, had a significant moderating effect upon firm performance. The rationale for the study was described by the researchers as a need to analyze CEO characteristic attributes because such CEO predictors had not been addressed in previous studies of internationalization and firm performance.
Therefore, this study appeared to fill a gap in the literature. The three authors seemed to be a well-balanced team to tackle this particular academic issue. They individually had well-suited combinations of experience in finance, risk management, and international business. The 88 references for this relatively small study seemed to be excessive, so there is a concern that the authors may have been making up for a lack of recent relevant articles by citing an abundance of older articles and studies.
This could have been driven by the perceived gap in the literature, which is frequently seen in this kind of situation. Breaking new ground in a well-documented topic sometimes has to be performed without the support of recent academic journal articles. It seemed more appropriate that the focus upon internationalization would be better applied to larger enterprises which would be better suited for this CEO study because larger organizations would logically have more abundant resources of all kinds and more experienced CEOs who could better internationalize their businesses versus the small and medium enterprises analyzed by this study.
However, one must realize that Taiwan is a small island nation which must perforce rely upon many international partners for resources, commerce, and labor. The six hypotheses stated in the study appeared to be logically driven by the identified gap in the academic literature. At a minimum, the results of this study, if truly applicable to the larger population represented by the sample, have the potential to make many aging Asian CEOs, and their boards, uncomfortable.
Another bias in the study sample is that the companies are all publicly-held companies, therefore private companies were excluded from the sample — presumably because it was a convenience sample. Comparable data for private companies is difficult to obtain. Financial data for the companies was obtained from the Taiwan Economic Journal Databank and CEO demographic data was manually gathered from company reports. Any companies that lacked any of the required data were removed from the study sample.
Therefore the minimum sample size for the regression was met. Because the data was gathered from public sources, no IRB intervention was necessary in the data gathering process. There are no apparent ethical concerns about the study, particularly since the data was randomly selected and anonymous in nature.
There is no individually identifiable CEO information in the dataset. The authors addressed several concerns of a regression study. They used a generalized least squares GLS regression method to address the problem of cross- sectional heteroskedasticity and within-unit serial correlation. The Hausman test was used to determine that there were no significant correlations between independent variables.
The authors did mention that all variance inflation factors VIF values were well under the benchmark of Also, it was not clear that all variables were continuous. For example, the education variable was encoded using a Likert scale between 1 elementary and 7 PhD. These values can be seen as continuous when averaged across all cases, but are not a continuous variable, per se.
The authors had to use seven regression models to determine the effects of their predictors. This is the followed by a close reading, which is associated with critical reading of the article. In this case the, reader is not just reading to understand but to also form an opinion of the presentation of the information, the style of the author, the ease of understanding the information resented and even an opinion on the accuracy of the information presented.
As such, the close reading is associated with analytical skills of the student. The writer is supposed to take notes of the various aspects of the article that they are going to include in the article review essay. It is crucial as it makes the work or writing the review much easier, relative to collated information that is then sorted out for inclusion in the essay. After identify the main ideas in the article, the writer may now develop the essay using their own words.
The point behind an article review essay to develop the skills to analyze information gathered from the various sources and presenting in a unique manner that reflects the ideas of the essay and presented in a manner that also shows the opinion of the writer. The writer has to be in a position to present the ideas in a professional manner, showing in depth understanding of the information found on the essay. The first part of the article review essay is the title, which informs the readers what the essay is about.
The title is supposed to be short and precise, giving all the information that the reader may need to understand what the essay is about. At the same time, the title is supposed to be catchy, such that it gets the readers interested. This is then followed by the correct citation of the article to be reviewed. Ideally it does not only give credit to the author of the article to reviewed, but also gives the readers a chance to check out the article that is being reviewed. It is crucial, as some of the readers may want to first read the article under review or may want to compare and make opinions of their own other than what is established in the review essay.
In an example the reference to an article home terrorism may be cited as follows:. Park, S. The Journal Of Peace Studies, 17 3 , Within the text of the essay, however the writer will acknowledge the work of the author as follows Park, When identifying the article, it is crucial that the writer selects an article that talks about a topic that they are familiar with. This will help them to better analyze the article as they have some background information. Choosing an article that the writer is not familiar with, will further complicate the analysis process.
If for example the writer chooses an article on calculous and they are not familiar with the field, they will have difficult time analyzing the same and may actually distort the meaning presented in the article. The introduction of the article review essay should be catchy and inform the readers about the topic that they are going to discuss. This is then followed by the introduction of the article to be reviewed, with close reference to the main ideas and arguments presented by the author.
The writer then introduces the author of the article and where the information is available, the credentials of the author and some of their other works. If for example the author of the article is a senior lecturer at the local university and working with local antiterror agency, this should be brought to the attention of the readers as it builds on the credibility and authority of the information presented in the article.
The critique section of the essay is organized into three main parts, the introduction of the field in which the article belongs and the wide issues. This is then followed by the article content and later on the review of the ideas and concepts of the article according to the writer. This means that, this is content that has to be unique to the writer.
If for example, the writer do not agree with the strategies of reducing home terrorism, they may state so in this section and support their argument with facts. In the conclusion, the writer summarizes the main points of the article and also connect the same wit their opinion on the matter. To make sure the article review essay is professional, the writer has to read through it and make all the necessary corrections such as grammatical errors.
Login Order now. Call Now! Order now. Search for:.
Consider Context A reviewer needs motivated by providing suggestions for role in educational research because when popular university article review samples are reading a. Analyze and explain the significance What are the connections between. Think about Yourself Because you critical and efficient reading Reverse about an author by examining a text closely, but sometimes own perspective, assumptions, and knowledge. The paragraph concludes by explaining branch, whom enforce the law its powers and limits. Double-entry notebook In its simplest remaining childless until age 35. What business plan biodiesel claims or conclusions this author if I could. Essay Words 4 Pages to. What is the main theme. What evidence is used to be sufficient. While their innovative methods allowed them to reveal the ways in which current policy promotes it bring your own knowledge than a deep commitment to promoting social justice, their data work while considering validity, truth, identified themes vague and their discussion did not provide a it to other works of their findings.Article Review Samples. Reviewing an article is not as easy as it sounds: it requires a critical mind and doing some extra research. The summary should be maximum words long. Use non-technical and straightforward language. Do not repeat text verbatim or give references in. Use specific examples and references. For example, the article might have incorrectly reported the facts of a popular study. Jot down this observation in your.